A US machine builder decides to enter Europe. They hire a law firm, incorporate a GmbH, register for VAT, appoint a managing director, and 18 months later they own a German company, a tax adviser, a registered office, and no customers.
The order is what went wrong. For a manufacturer selling capital equipment, the first European sale arrives through a channel partner, and the legal structure follows the revenue. Picking the route to market comes first, conformity runs alongside it on its own clock, and incorporation waits for one of four specific triggers.
EU market entry for US companies gets treated as a legal project, which is why the entity question gets answered thoroughly and the customer question barely at all. The customer question is the one that decides whether you have a European business.
What EU market entry actually involves for a US manufacturer
Three gates, in the order they bite.
Channel. Someone has to find European customers, quote them, and close them. That someone is almost never you, at least not in year one. Who they are, what they cost and what you owe them is the whole game.
Conformity. Your machine has to be legally placeable on the EU market before anyone can sell it. CE marking, a technical file, a declaration of conformity, and instructions in the right language. This is a gate, and it runs on its own clock.
Contract. What you sign with the partner determines what you owe them when the relationship ends. European law is less permissive here than US law, and the surprise is expensive.
US companies routinely work these in reverse, starting with entity formation and arriving at the channel question last. Entity formation is the easiest of the three to buy and the least useful to have finished.
The three gates, in the order they bite
1. Channel. Who sells it, on what terms, in which countries. Decide this first, because everything else is sized by the answer.
2. Conformity. Can the product legally be placed on the EU market. Start this in parallel with the partner search, not after it. A partner will ask for your Declaration of Conformity in the first serious conversation.
3. Contract. What you owe the partner at termination. Have it reviewed before you sign by a lawyer who practises commercial agency and distribution law in the country whose law will govern the agreement. Ask three things specifically: whether the arrangement as drafted would be treated as commercial agency whatever it is called, what the termination exposure looks like in that country, and whether the customer-data clause creates exposure you did not intend.
Do you need a European entity to sell in Europe?
For most industrial products, no. You need an economic operator established in the European Union, which is a different thing and usually somebody else’s company.
Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, applicable since 16 July 2021, says that products covered by certain EU legislation may only be placed on the market if there is an economic operator established in the Union. Machinery is in scope, because Directive 2006/42/EC is on that list. So the requirement is real, and a US manufacturer selling machinery into the EU cannot ignore it.
What satisfies it is broader than most US companies assume. The economic operator can be an EU-established importer, which in practice is your distributor. It can be an authorised representative, meaning a natural or legal person established in the EU who holds a written mandate from you. It can be a fulfilment service provider where none of the others exist. The authorised representative is a mandate you grant to someone else, so appointing one involves signing a document rather than forming a company.
Finding one is a smaller problem than it sounds. Acting as an authorised representative is its own commercial category, generally offered by EU-based product-compliance consultancies and firms adjacent to the notified bodies. What matters is the mandate scope. It has to cover keeping the technical documentation and the declaration of conformity available to market surveillance authorities for at least 10 years and cooperating with those authorities on request. It cannot cover drawing up the technical documentation, because that obligation stays with you and cannot be delegated.
The importer role carries weight, which is why some distributors won’t take it. Today those duties reach a machinery importer through Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020: verify that the EU declaration of conformity was drawn up, keep it available to market surveillance authorities, and make the technical documentation available on request. From 20 January 2027, Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 spells the same duties out directly for machinery importers and adds the ones worth planning for now. The importer’s own name, trade name and address go on the product or its packaging, and a copy of the declaration of conformity is kept for 10 years after the machine is placed on the market. And if they place your machinery on the market under their own brand, they take on the manufacturer’s obligations entirely.
A distributor who reads that clause carefully and pushes back is a distributor who has imported before. Treat the pushback as a qualification signal.
Four situations do force an entity, and they are all downstream of having customers.
General guidance for machinery and industrial equipment, not legal advice. Obligations vary by product category and by member state.
The four routes into Europe, compared
| Direct export | Distributor (Vertragshändler) | Commercial agent (Handelsvertreter) | Own subsidiary | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Who owns the customer | You | They do, commercially | You do | You |
| Who holds stock | Nobody in-market | They do | Nobody, or you | You |
| Who carries credit risk | You | They do | You | You |
| How they are paid | Not applicable | Resale margin | Commission on orders | Salary and overhead |
| Speed to first revenue | Fastest, and thinnest | Slow to sign, then steady | Moderate | Slowest |
| Cost to exit | Low | Can be high, a statutory claim reaches some distributors too | High, statutory indemnity applies | Highest |
| Best fit | Spares, repeat orders, existing enquiries | Consumables and catalogue products needing local stock | Capital equipment, technical sale, deal size above roughly EUR 45,000 | After the market is proven |
For capital equipment above roughly EUR 45,000, the commercial agent beats the distributor in Europe. A resale margin on a six-figure machine is expensive coverage, and a distributor carrying a dozen lines will quote your product and sell whatever closes fastest. An agent on commission spends time on the two-hour application conversation that this kind of sale requires.
The subsidiary is almost always premature. It is the most expensive way to discover that your product needs a feature change for the European market, and you will discover that either way.
One route deserves more than a table cell. If you already have inbound European enquiries, and many US manufacturers reading this do, fill them directly before you build anything. Direct export teaches you what European buyers actually ask for, what your documentation is missing and what your landed cost really is, and it produces the first European reference that makes every partner conversation easier. Build the channel second, with data. A partner search run before you have ever shipped into Europe is a search run on assumptions.
Two consequences to carry into that search. The distributor route can carry a termination cost that US companies do not expect, because German courts extend the commercial agent indemnity to distributors in defined circumstances. And the agent and the distributor get qualified on completely different things, because an agent holds no stock, commissions nothing and employs no service technicians. On the agent route those jobs stay with you.
The commercial agent route has a specific legal consequence that US companies do not expect, covered below and in detail in our guide to finding distributors in Europe.
Inmotion is building a DACH partner search service
This is the partner search we’ve run into the US for European manufacturers, pointed the other way. It doesn’t exist yet and there’s no date to give you. If you want to hear when it does, leave your email below.
You're on the list.
We'll email you once, when the service opens. Nothing else.
Which European country first
Germany, for machinery, robotics and welding. That is the default and it is usually right, for reasons that have nothing to do with GDP tables.
The density of machine builders and their component suppliers runs south and west, around Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria and North Rhine-Westphalia. Official 2023 statistics compiled by VDMA put those three states at roughly 72% of German mechanical-engineering employment and 71% of its turnover, which tells you where the machines get built. Where they get bought is an inference from that rather than a separate measurement, so treat it as our read. Those firms buy equipment, they buy it repeatedly, and they talk to each other. A German reference customer is portable across the rest of Europe in a way that a Dutch or Polish one is not. That portability is the actual argument for entering Germany first, and it is worth more than the size of the domestic market.
Germany also sets the documentation bar. A German buyer’s expectations on operating instructions, technical file and service response are the most demanding in Europe, so clearing that bar once means the work transfers. The language obligation does not. Instructions have to be in the official language of each member state where the machine is placed on the market, so France needs French and Italy needs Italian, and a German manual is a non-conformity there rather than a head start.
The honest counter-cases, and these are judgements from channel work rather than published data. The Netherlands works well for logistics-led and distribution-heavy products, and Dutch firms are comfortable operating in English. Poland and Czechia have real manufacturing depth and buy on price more readily, which suits cost-sensitive volume products. The UK is a separate commercial market since Brexit, with its own distributors, its own price expectations, and no spillover of a British reference into Germany. The conformity side is easier than Americans expect, because Great Britain recognises CE marking for machinery indefinitely, so there is no second marking exercise and no UKCA. What the UK does not give you is a route into the EU.
One thing to say plainly. “Europe” covers roughly 30 separate markets with different languages, buying norms, service expectations and legal systems, and a distributor claiming European coverage from a single office is claiming something they can’t deliver. Granting continent-wide exclusivity to that distributor is the most common and most expensive mistake in this whole process.
DACH, and what Americans mean when they say Germany
DACH means Germany (D), Austria (A) and Switzerland (CH). It is one practical sales territory: a partner in Stuttgart can realistically work all three, the technical documentation is the same German, and buying norms are close enough to treat as one market.
Americans searching “Germany” usually mean DACH. The rest of Europe does not come with it. France, Italy, Iberia, the Nordics, Benelux and Central and Eastern Europe are separate territories that need separate partners, and Switzerland sits outside the EU customs union, so goods crossing that border clear customs.
CE marking and what it does to your timeline
CE marking is a declaration you make about your own product. For most machinery, nobody sells you one.
Where your machine is not listed in Annex IV of the Machinery Directive, you assess conformity yourself through internal checks, compile a technical file, and draw up an EU Declaration of Conformity. You or your authorised representative sign it. That signature is you personally asserting that the machine meets the essential health and safety requirements, and it carries the legal weight that assertion implies. A notified body only ever comes into it for the 23 higher-risk categories listed in Annex IV, such as certain presses, saws and vehicle servicing lifts. Even there it is conditional. Build an Annex IV machine fully to harmonised standards that cover every relevant essential requirement and Article 12(3)(a) still lets you use internal checks. Miss that condition and type-examination or full quality assurance by a notified body becomes the only route.
Two standards will occupy most of the work for a US machine builder. EN ISO 12100 governs risk assessment and risk reduction, and it is the methodological foundation the rest of the system sits on. EN 60204-1 covers the electrical equipment of machines, and it is where a machine designed to US practice collides with European expectations.
The collision shows up first in the wiring. Conductor colour coding differs: protective earth is green-and-yellow in Europe, while US practice permits green or green-and-yellow, and the grounded neutral is white or grey in the US against blue in Europe. The required content of the technical documentation differs too, and EN 60204-1 asks for material a US package usually will not contain, including the residual risks left after the protective measures and the training or personal protective equipment those risks imply. Budget an electrical design and documentation review, not a translation. Building to NFPA 79 buys you no presumption of conformity in Europe.
Then there is language. Annex I, section 1.7.4 of the Machinery Directive requires that machinery be accompanied by instructions in the official language or languages of the member state where it is placed on the market or put into service. For Germany that means German. Versions you draw up and verify yourself carry the marking “Original instructions”. Any version you did not draw up has to be marked “Translation of the original instructions”, which is where most US manufacturers end up once they buy the German translation in. Translating a 200-page operating manual into technical German is a procurement exercise with a lead time, and it is routinely discovered three weeks before it is needed.
One deadline to put in the calendar. Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 of 14 June 2023 replaces the Machinery Directive and applies from 20 January 2027. It is worth knowing where that date comes from, because the Regulation as first published said 14 January and a corrigendum in the Official Journal of 4 July 2023 corrected it to the 20th. Anyone quoting you the earlier date is reading the uncorrected text. Until then the Directive governs. Because it is a Regulation, it applies directly in every member state with no national transposition, so there is one text rather than 27 implementations of it. If your product will still be on sale in 2027, design to the Regulation now rather than re-doing the file later.
- 0-2 monthsStart both tracks together Begin the risk assessment under EN ISO 12100 and start building the partner long list in the same week. Neither depends on the other, and running them in series adds half a year for no reason.
- 1-4 monthsTechnical file and electrical review Compile the technical documentation and review the machine against EN 60204-1. Budget engineering hours here, because changes found now are cheaper than changes found during a customer's technical acceptance.
- 2-5 monthsTranslation of instructions Technical German translation of operating and maintenance instructions. Start when the manual is stable. This is the item that most often slips.
- 3-6 monthsDeclaration of conformity signed You or your authorised representative sign the EU Declaration of Conformity and affix the CE marking. Serious partner conversations can now proceed to quotation.
- 4-7 monthsPartner shortlist and negotiation Running in parallel the whole time. A partner will ask for the Declaration during qualification, so the two tracks need to converge around here.
How European industrial buyers buy differently
The technical evaluation is longer and it is genuinely technical. A German machine builder evaluating a capital purchase will ask for documentation early, will read it, and will come back with questions written by an engineer rather than a purchasing manager. Vague answers end the conversation quietly.
Documentation is a gate. Operating instructions in German are a legal requirement for machinery, and a buyer who asks who is producing them is checking whether you have sold into Europe before.
Spare parts availability is asked early and weighted heavily. A European production manager wants to know what happens when the machine stops on a Tuesday, and “we ship from Ohio” is an answer that loses deals. This is the single most common reason a technically superior US product loses to a weaker European competitor.
References carry more weight than they do in the US, and your American references carry less than you expect. A European buyer discounts a US installation because the service and support conditions are different. Your first European reference customer is therefore worth more than the next five, and it’s worth discounting heavily to get it.
These are patterns from channel work rather than published benchmarks, so treat the table as a brief rather than a measurement.
| What changes | United States | Europe | What you do about it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technical evaluation | Shorter, often sales-led | Longer, engineer-led, document-heavy | Send the technical file early and unprompted |
| Documentation language | English throughout | Official language of the member state is mandatory for machinery | Budget translation into the project plan from day one |
| Spare parts | Expected, rarely a gating question | Frequently a gating question | Have a stocking answer before the first meeting |
| Reference customers | US references land well | Local references land, US references discount | Price the first European installation to win it |
| Quote-to-close | Faster, and forecastable from your own history | Longer, and your US history will not predict it | Ask three firms in your category what their cycle looks like, and resist replacing the partner at month 3 |
| Who you meet | Decision-maker earlier | Technical evaluator first, commercial later | Send an engineer to the first meeting |
What it costs and how long it takes
Very little in this market has a published price, so treat the numbers below with the labels attached to them.
The German Chambers of Commerce Abroad are the exception, and the German-British Chamber in London publishes the most detailed card in the network. The figures below are sterling and UK-facing, so read them as the shape of the offer rather than the price you will be quoted in the US, where the German American Chambers of Commerce price their own equivalents. The Chamber lists Address Research at £120.00 including up to 10 addresses (£102.00 for members), with additional addresses at £2.40 each and delivery within two or three working days of payment. A Partner Mailing is £4,800, split into £2,400 up front and £2,400 on completion, and takes approximately two months with a research phase of four to six weeks. An Agent Search runs £1,200 plus advertising costs over the course of a year. Subsidiaries databases are £1,200.00 (£1,020.00 for members). All prices include VAT, and orders are prepaid. The Chamber states it is supported by the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy under a resolution of the German Parliament, which is why the rates are what they are.
Before any of that, use the service your own taxes already fund. The US Commercial Service runs partner-finding programmes out of its overseas posts, including the International Partner Search and the Gold Key Service, which identifies prescreened candidates, arranges meetings with potential agents and distributors in the target market and sends staff to attend them. Published user fees put the Gold Key standard package at $950 for a small company, or $800 to identify contacts and arrange the meetings without attendance. The Enterprise Europe Network runs a partnering database that is free to use and carries cooperation profiles from companies across more than 60 countries. Neither replaces the technical qualification, and both cost less than anything private. Work them first.
Read what those deliverables are. An address list is an address list. A mailing is a mailing. Neither includes a judgement about whether a firm can commission and service your machine, and neither includes the follow-through when a promising partner goes quiet for three weeks. That is an accurate description of the product. At £120 for ten addresses, nobody should expect otherwise.
Everything else on the stack below is a planning line, with the reasoning attached to each.
- Address research, 10 addresses £120.00 including VAT, published chamber rate
- Partner mailing campaign, approx. 2 months £4,800 including VAT, published chamber rate
- Commercial agent search over one year £1,200 plus advertising, published chamber rate
- Conformity engineering and technical file Planning line. Driven by how far the machine sits from EN 60204-1 today. A machinery-safety consultancy or a notified body will sell you a gap assessment; buy one before you budget.
- Technical German translation of instructions Planning line. Scales with manual length and diagram count. Quote it from your actual page count.
- Travel for partner meetings and one trade show Planning line. Two to three trips in year one is realistic for a serious search.
- Demo or loan equipment in-market Planning line. Often the difference between a shortlist and a signature for capital equipment.
- Legal review of the partner agreement, in-country Planning line, and the one least worth cutting. See the termination section below.
- Assuming entry cost ends at signature The year or more of partner support that follows signature is where the budget actually goes
What the chamber rates buy
A filtered list and a mailing. Qualification, technical judgement and follow-through are separate work.
One clock, and every figure on this page and its companion runs on it. Counting starts the week you begin research, not the week you first contact anyone.
Three commercial items no cost table carries, each of which can cost more than the partner search. Quote currency. A six-figure machine quoted in dollars and paid in euros four months later carries real exchange exposure, so decide who holds it and put it in the quotation. Incoterms. Agree the term before the first quote, because the gap between EXW and DDP is the difference between your distributor arranging EU import and customs clearance and you doing it. Product liability. Your US policy will not automatically follow the machine into the EU, and the first substantive negotiation item with a European distributor for machinery is indemnification and a certificate of insurance. Get the cover quoted before that conversation rather than during it.
- 1-2 monthsResearch and long list Decide the territory, build the long list from association members, trade show exhibitor directories and competitor dealer pages. Start conformity work in the same period.
- 2-4 monthsOutreach and first conversations First contact through to qualification calls. Expect a slower reply rate than US outreach and a higher quality of reply when it comes.
- 3-5 monthsQualification, references and a site visit Reference calls with the partner's existing principals, a check on the filed accounts, and a visit to the premises. A shortlist from a real search is small.
- 5-7 monthsNegotiation, legal review and signature Territory, performance milestones, customer-data clauses and the termination position, reviewed under the law that will govern the agreement.
- 7-9 monthsOnboarding and first joint customer visits In-person training at their premises, time with their service technicians, first quotations out.
- 12-18 monthsFirst partner-sourced revenue Closed revenue lands here, on whatever quote-to-order cycle your product carries in that country. This gap is where most US companies lose patience and blame the partner.
What US companies get wrong
Six failure patterns, in rough order of cost.
1. Incorporating before validating. A GmbH before a customer converts a hypothesis into fixed overhead. Form the entity when staff, stock or a tender forces it.
2. Treating Europe as one territory. Granting continent-wide exclusivity to a partner who can work one country is the most expensive signature in this process, and it is almost always reversible only by paying to get out.
3. Signing a US-drafted agreement and assuming US law governs the outcome. Commercial agent protections under Directive 86/653/EEC apply to agents operating in the EU and cannot be waived in advance. A choice-of-law clause does not escape them either: in Ingmar (C-381/98) the Court of Justice held that they apply where the agent works in a member state even though the principal sits in a non-member country and the contract picks that country’s law. The defendant there was a US company. The German courts extend the same principle to distributors in defined circumstances. Our guide to finding European distributors covers the mechanics.
4. Skipping German-language documentation. It is a legal requirement for machinery and a competence signal to the buyer. Deals are lost at technical review over this, and the loss is usually attributed to price.
5. Sending a salesperson to close rather than an engineer to listen. The first European meeting is a technical evaluation. Send someone who can answer the engineer’s question in the room.
6. Budgeting for the search and not for the year that follows it. The partner needs training, demo support, quotation help and patience long after signature. A partner abandoned six months after signing produces nothing, which then gets recorded as the partner’s failure.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I need a GmbH to sell my product in Germany?
Usually no. For machinery and most industrial products, EU law requires an economic operator established in the Union, not a company owned by you. Under Article 4 of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020, that role can be filled by an EU-established importer (typically your distributor), an authorised representative holding a written mandate from you, or a fulfilment service provider. Forming a GmbH becomes necessary when you hire staff in Germany, hold your own consignment stock, or bid for work that requires an EU establishment.
Can a US company be the importer of record in the EU?
No. The importer under EU product law is by definition established in the Union, so a US company cannot hold that role itself. Your EU distributor or the end customer takes it. Whoever accepts it has to verify that the conformity assessment was carried out and the technical documentation drawn up, and keep the declaration of conformity available to market surveillance authorities under Article 4(3) of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. From 20 January 2027, Article 13 of Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 makes it explicit for machinery: the importer's own name and address on the product or its packaging, and the declaration kept for 10 years. That is a real liability, and it is why some distributors refuse.
Is CE marking a certification I have to buy?
For most machinery, no. CE marking is a declaration the manufacturer makes about its own product after assessing conformity through internal checks. You sign the EU Declaration of Conformity yourself and you carry the legal consequences of signing it. A notified body only comes into it for the 23 higher-risk categories listed in Annex IV of the Machinery Directive, such as certain presses and saws, and even for those you can still self-assess if the machine is built fully to harmonised standards covering every relevant essential requirement.
Which EU country should a US manufacturer enter first?
For machinery, robotics and welding equipment, Germany is the usual answer, because the concentration of machine builders and their suppliers is there and a German reference customer carries weight across the rest of Europe. The Netherlands suits logistics-led products, and Poland and Czechia suit cost-sensitive volume. The UK has been a separate commercial market since Brexit and works badly as a route into the EU, though Great Britain still recognises CE marking for machinery, so the conformity work carries over.
How long does it take to find a European sales partner?
Counting from the week you start research, plan on 5 to 7 months to a signed agreement and 12 to 18 months to meaningful revenue. Research and the long list take about two months, outreach and qualification calls another two, then references, a credit check and a site visit before negotiation starts. European industrial buying cycles run longer than US ones, and most US companies underestimate the gap after signature and conclude the partner is failing when the partner is working a slower market.
What is the difference between a distributor and a Handelsvertreter?
A distributor (Vertragshändler) buys your product, takes title, carries the stock and the credit risk, and resells at a margin. A Handelsvertreter is a commercial agent who sells in your name for commission and never takes title. The difference matters at termination: commercial agents across the EU have a statutory claim to an indemnity or compensation under Directive 86/653/EEC that cannot be signed away in advance.
Does the EU Machinery Regulation change anything for a US machine builder?
Yes, from 20 January 2027. Regulation (EU) 2023/1230 replaces the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC on that date. Until then, machinery placed on the EU market is assessed against the Directive. Because it is a Regulation rather than a Directive, it applies directly in every member state without national transposition, so the text you comply with is the same everywhere. If your product will still be selling in 2027, build to the Regulation now.
Inmotion has spent years on the other side of this table, building US channels for European manufacturers: the same problem, the same three gates, viewed from the opposite direction. The method transfers, and the US market entry guides set it out in full for companies moving the other way.
Nothing on this page is legal advice. Product conformity, agency law and tax treatment vary by member state and by product category, and the agreement you sign should be reviewed by someone who practises in the country it governs.